House church finances

Mike, Jon and David after breakfastWe had breakfast with Jon Dale and his friend David, talking about the National House Church Conference and starting a discussion about financing house church planters. Mike and I continued the discussion later, both wanting to conclude that we should not – after all, isn’t one of the advantages of house churches that they do not need full-time workers or financing? Our discussion led us to another conclusion, though; looking at our experience with the movement so far, we had to admit that the people who had been most effective and had the most influence were those who could devote the most time to it. So there is an argument for full-time house church workers. We then have to ask what these people do, how many of them we need, and where the money should come from. Continue reading “House church finances”

Revolution, chapter 5

Barna describes societal trends which have an impact on how people approach faith and spirituality. In such a short space, his treatment of each trend is naturally rather superficial. He writes very succinctly, though, giving much food for thought.
“The more you can anticipate some of the transitions resulting from these trends, the greater will be your ability to help shape the world in ways that are likely to honor God and advance your spiritual maturity. This will impact your own life and the lives of others with whom you interact.” Let us take that to heart.

Chapter 5 of Revolution is titled “Spiritual transitions in the making”. Barna describes societal trends which have an impact on how people approach faith and spirituality. In such a short space, his treatment of each trend is naturally rather superficial. He writes very succinctly, though, giving much food for thought. Here’s a summary of the trends he has identified: Continue reading “Revolution, chapter 5”

Revolution, part 2

In chapter 4 of ‘Revolution’, George Barna takes a look at how the church fares in fulfilling the seven passions which he has identified in Revolutionaries. According to his research, it is generally doing badly.
The chapter ends with the statement “The Revolution is about recognizing that we are not called to go to church. We are called to be the Church.” (In his terminology, ‘church’ means the local church, ‘Church’ the global body of Christ).

This was a good presentation of the general state of the traditional church, managing to both recognise its achievements in the past and clearly present a rationale for desiring change.

In chapter 4 of ‘Revolution’, George Barna takes a look at how the church fares in fulfilling the seven passions which he has identified in Revolutionaries. According to his research, it is generally doing badly.
“If the local church is God’s answer to our spiritual needs, then why are most churched Christians so spiritually immature and desperate?”
“One of the greatest frustrations of my life has been the disconnection between what our research consistently shows about churched Christians and what the Bible calls us to be.”

Having said that, he recognises that the local church has made a valuable contribution throughout its history; to dispute that would be tantamount to claiming that God does not have the power to work even through imperfect channels: Continue reading “Revolution, part 2”

Who is your covering?: all the rest

Who is your covering? book coverFrank Viola’s book concludes with a look at the nature of apostolic authority. He makes the point that we often look at Paul (particularly) as being a very authoritarian leader. Examining his writing, however, we find appeals, arguments presented, and references to fellow workers such as Timothy and Titus as ‘sons’, writing that Titus, for example “has gone to you of his own accord” (2. Cor. 8:17).
This ties in with Paul’s statement about apostles in 1. Cor. 4:9, “For it seems to me that God has put us apostles on display at the end of the procession, like men condemned to die in the arena.” That does not sound like someone professing great authority in his position.

In summary, Who is your covering? gives a good insight into the meaning of many of the New Testament’s statements about authority. Even though I did not agree with everything he said, the book was thought-provoking. It is well worth reading.

Who is your covering?: denominations and orthodoxy

Book coverMuch of Frank Viola’s book is concerned with taking particular teachings related to the question ‘Who is your covering?’ and presenting an argument against those teachings. In his section on denominational covering, he makes the point that “When a denominational headquarters is infected by false teaching, every church connected with it falls into that same falsehood and the heresy becomes widespread”, contrasting this with what he claims is the intended “autonomous nature of every church“. I’m not convinced that his argument is entirely correct; individual pastors do not automatically accept new teaching or policies from the denominational headquarters, and supposedly autonomous house churches are linked by relationship, which is also a potential method for heresy to spread. However, I do believe that a looser relational link is more likely to resist heresy than a hierarchical structure.
Continue reading “Who is your covering?: denominations and orthodoxy”

More on ‘Who is your covering?’

Continuing to look at Frank Viola’s book ‘Who is your covering?’.
The primary authority over the local churches were the elders. Paul instructed Titus, for example, to “appoint elders in every town”. Two things are notable (my addition to the comments in the book): firstly, the church in a city or region is generally referred to singularly, not ‘the churches’, and Titus should appoint ‘elders’, apparently indicating that there should be several of them in each church. Secondly, in the list of attributes required to become an elder, the word used suddenly changes from ‘presbuteros’ (‘elderly man’) to ‘episkopos’, often translated as ‘bishop’. This appears to indicate that bishops were the same thing as elders, and that there were several of them in each church.

Who is your coveringI’ve read further in Frank Viola’s book ‘Who is your covering?’. It is a quite remarkable book, going back to the Greek words and examining their meaning, also looking at the context of the period in which they were written.
He starts by looking at models of leadership (basically contrasting hierarchical models with Jesus’ words):
Continue reading “More on ‘Who is your covering?’”

“Who is your covering?”

I’ve just started reading Frank Viola’s book “Who is your covering?”, which discusses leadership structures in the church. His precept is basically that the hierarchical structures in today’s church, whether Catholic, Protestant, Reformed or most independent churches or denominations, do not conform to the pattern of the early church. He paints a rather black and white picture, but I understand what he is aiming for.

I’ve just started reading Frank Viola’s book “Who is your covering?”, which discusses leadership structures in the church. His precept is basically that the hierarchical structures in today’s church, whether Catholic, Protestant, Reformed or most independent churches or denominations, do not conform to the pattern of the early church. He paints a rather black and white picture, but I understand what he is aiming for. Some of Mary-Anne’s comments in “Heiliger Vater” are similar to the points he is making. I agree with his statement that an organised hierarchy tends to stunt the church members’ spiritual development, because they can, or even must, delegate or defer many spiritual responsibilities to the hierarchy. Imagine permanently confining a person to a playpen from birth; their development would be severely limited, and they would never reach the maturity required of an adult. As adults, it is our responsibility to raise our children so that they become adults capable of assuming responsibility for their lives and the community in which they live. I believe that this responsibility is also echoed in the spiritual realm; it is the responsibility of mature Christians to care for and mentor younger Christians, with the aim of seeing them grow to their full potential, taking the responsibility and using the gifts God gives them.

“Heiliger Vater”: Papstbesuch in Deutschland zum Jugendtag

Tausende von jungen Pilgern, sogar aus Irak und Mexiko, sind nach Köln in Deutschland gepilgert, um dem Papst Benedict XVI. zu huldigen. Die Medien berichten voller Begeisterung von der “neuen Religiösität. Eine Stimmung vergleichbar mit dem “Christustag in Basel”.
Aber statt in Sprechchören Jesus zu rufen, wird “Benedict” gerufen. Natürlich haben auch die Evangelikalen ihre “Päpste”, seien es Benny Hinn, Rick Joyner, Erich Räber oder andere Prediger. Aber dennoch, auch in Anbetracht, dass Menschen gerne “Leitfiguren” suchen und auch brauchen, finde ich es bedenklich den Papst “Heiligen Vater” zu nennen. Was sagt denn Jesus zu dieser Geschichte?
Continue reading ““Heiliger Vater”: Papstbesuch in Deutschland zum Jugendtag”